I loved this book just as much as I did the first. You know those books that you try to savor by reading each and every word, gently caressing each page as you turn it and seeing how long you can possibly read it? This was one of those rare gems.
This memoir by Haven Kimmel is told with particular attention to Zippy's mother, a formerly deeply depressed woman who spent her life on the couch with pork rinds and science fiction. Her mother, Delonda, finally gets off the couch and gets a degree in English, before becoming an English professor herself. There are still the occasional mentions of Zippy's father, who was a star character in the first book, but Zippy's mother is the main focus of the book.
She Got Up Off the Couch is written with the same child's voice that Kimmel used in the first book. I think that brilliant style of writing is even more apparent as you can hear Zippy's voice change as she grows up. The tone is still that unmistakable child interpreting events voice, but the tone is different from the first books. There is a new awareness. Kimmel mentions realizing that, oh yeah, she only ever got a bath when she was at her friends' houses and the dawning realization that not everybody lives in a tenement house and has a gambling father.
The book's tone has a slightly more serious, growing-up tone to it, but it is still laugh-out-loud funny in many parts. The same uproarious games with friends, colorful characters in the small town, and strange-but-true events are present here that were in the first one.
When you pick up a sequel to an adored book, there's always this fear that the second one won't quite match up to the first, that nothing can even try to compete. But Haven Kimmel has created a second book as memorable as her first. Please, please, please go and buy this book and read it and then come back and tell me I was right.
(I'm adding the amazon associates link this week because this is a book that I really, really think everybody should read this.)
Friday, July 18, 2014
Thursday, July 17, 2014
The Katniss Dress, Pt. 2
(Here's Part 1 of this series of posts)
Well, after much deliberation and backing and forthing, I chose my rough draft fabric: a pretty 1940s reproduction print on some cheap quilting cotton. I happily reached for the pattern that I had mentioned I was planning to use, but then I stopped. The dress just wasn't quite right. It wasn't supposed to blouse at the waist, the shoulders would be dropping off my shoulders, and I didn't want that collar. I realized that the only design element that I wanted was the gathered shoulders. I realized that the reaping dress that Katniss wears is a 1940s inspired dress, not late 70s, and that was why the dress pattern looked so wrong. So I went back to google and searched '1940s dresses, ruched shoulders" and came up with tons of dress patterns that looked just like the Katniss reaping dress. I ran up to the sewing room and did a lot of digging through patterns and came up with two patterns that I decided to combine to make one very Katniss-ey looking dress.
And here are the results! The fabric I did my practice run in is a floral print, so the shoulder gathers and the way the waist is fitted don't show up very well, but they will in the real fabric, which is solid blue. It's also quilting cotton, which tends to be stiffer, so it isn't quite as swishy as it will be in the final dress.
And here are the pictures of this lovely dress. Yippee!
*Thanks to Aden for the pictures of the dress!*
Well, after much deliberation and backing and forthing, I chose my rough draft fabric: a pretty 1940s reproduction print on some cheap quilting cotton. I happily reached for the pattern that I had mentioned I was planning to use, but then I stopped. The dress just wasn't quite right. It wasn't supposed to blouse at the waist, the shoulders would be dropping off my shoulders, and I didn't want that collar. I realized that the only design element that I wanted was the gathered shoulders. I realized that the reaping dress that Katniss wears is a 1940s inspired dress, not late 70s, and that was why the dress pattern looked so wrong. So I went back to google and searched '1940s dresses, ruched shoulders" and came up with tons of dress patterns that looked just like the Katniss reaping dress. I ran up to the sewing room and did a lot of digging through patterns and came up with two patterns that I decided to combine to make one very Katniss-ey looking dress.
And here are the results! The fabric I did my practice run in is a floral print, so the shoulder gathers and the way the waist is fitted don't show up very well, but they will in the real fabric, which is solid blue. It's also quilting cotton, which tends to be stiffer, so it isn't quite as swishy as it will be in the final dress.
I used this bodice and front tie, minus the scalloped edge. I just drew a curved line around the scallops on the pattern. |
I used this skirt and sleeves. |
*Thanks to Aden for the pictures of the dress!*
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Pictures of Today
Instead of being a good blogger and review two finished books, or writing about my first draft of the Katniss dress that is finished (!), I'm doing this:
Just one of the containers that held apples. |
That is, I'm making applesauce today. Yes, folks, canning season is in full swing, which means that writing about interesting things takes the back burner.
Ps. These pictures were taken with the camera on the laptop. Desperate times call for desperate measures. My camera has croaked, leaving me sadly picture-less. I was extremely surprised by how good these ended up turning out.
Labels:
Cooking,
Farming,
Making,
Miscellaneous,
Photography,
Thoughts
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Top Ten Tuesday- Top Ten TV Shows/Movies
(This week, The Broke and Bookish is having us mention our top ten favorite non-book stories, meaning tv shows, movies, etc.)
It felt weird writing this post because a.) I write about books, not movies/shows and b.) I've never really reviewed or discussed movies/shows before and I couldn't think of what to write. However, I decided that this would be an excellent exercise in writing something I'm not used to, so here goes:
1. Little Women-This movie definitely comes in first place. Dear, dear, Little Women. I loved the book so much and of course, I couldn't turn the movie down. I've seen this movie about 8 times and it never gets old.
2. Sherlock-This fabulous TV show is one of the few shows that I actually watched all the way through without finding it ridiculously dumb by season 2. It's smart, funny, dark, and edge-of your-seat-watching.
3. Pride and Prejudice-The Colin Firth one, of course. He's the only actor I've ever seen who could pull off Darcy. There was a version that starred Keira Knightley, but the guy who starred as Darcy (can't remember his name) was kind of sad-sack.
4. Oh Brother Where Art Thou- Another movie I've seen multiple times. I laugh and laugh whenever I see it. It's very loosely based on The Odyssey and is setting in the south in the 30s. Everybody absolutely has to see this.
5. Jeeves and Wooster- A British TV series based on the wonderful books by P.G. Wodehouse that, sadly, didn't last long, but was wonderful while it did. Hugh Laurie was brilliant as Wooster. Then, later, I heard he was starring as the curmudgeonly doctor in House and I was further convinced that Laurie is a brilliant actor. Going from a bumbling aristocrat in the 20s to a smart, bitter doctor nowadays is amazing. And he sings and plays the piano. Need I say more?
6. Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day- A funny, sweet comedy set in the 30s based on a book that I could never find (gah). I loved this movie. In fact, maybe I need to see this again...
7. Little Dorrit- The Dickens series that nobody sees. I loved, loved, loved this series. It's interesting, exciting, romantic, and even funny at parts.
8. Food, Inc.- The documentary that everybody has to see. I don't usually make sweeping statements like this, but the food culture in America in particular, and the western world in general, is beautifully addressed in this documentary. It manages to be honest and serious, yet not so depressing that you want to jump off a cliff after hearing the news.
9. North by Northwest- I love Hitchcock and this is probably my favorite. I sat on the edge of my seat the whole movie.
10. Rebecca- Do you know, I have never seen the iconic Hitchcock version of Rebecca? I've only seen an obscure Masterpiece Theater version that was made some time in the 2000s. It was fantastic and I can wholeheartedly recommend it.
It felt weird writing this post because a.) I write about books, not movies/shows and b.) I've never really reviewed or discussed movies/shows before and I couldn't think of what to write. However, I decided that this would be an excellent exercise in writing something I'm not used to, so here goes:
1. Little Women-This movie definitely comes in first place. Dear, dear, Little Women. I loved the book so much and of course, I couldn't turn the movie down. I've seen this movie about 8 times and it never gets old.
2. Sherlock-This fabulous TV show is one of the few shows that I actually watched all the way through without finding it ridiculously dumb by season 2. It's smart, funny, dark, and edge-of your-seat-watching.
3. Pride and Prejudice-The Colin Firth one, of course. He's the only actor I've ever seen who could pull off Darcy. There was a version that starred Keira Knightley, but the guy who starred as Darcy (can't remember his name) was kind of sad-sack.
4. Oh Brother Where Art Thou- Another movie I've seen multiple times. I laugh and laugh whenever I see it. It's very loosely based on The Odyssey and is setting in the south in the 30s. Everybody absolutely has to see this.
5. Jeeves and Wooster- A British TV series based on the wonderful books by P.G. Wodehouse that, sadly, didn't last long, but was wonderful while it did. Hugh Laurie was brilliant as Wooster. Then, later, I heard he was starring as the curmudgeonly doctor in House and I was further convinced that Laurie is a brilliant actor. Going from a bumbling aristocrat in the 20s to a smart, bitter doctor nowadays is amazing. And he sings and plays the piano. Need I say more?
6. Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day- A funny, sweet comedy set in the 30s based on a book that I could never find (gah). I loved this movie. In fact, maybe I need to see this again...
7. Little Dorrit- The Dickens series that nobody sees. I loved, loved, loved this series. It's interesting, exciting, romantic, and even funny at parts.
8. Food, Inc.- The documentary that everybody has to see. I don't usually make sweeping statements like this, but the food culture in America in particular, and the western world in general, is beautifully addressed in this documentary. It manages to be honest and serious, yet not so depressing that you want to jump off a cliff after hearing the news.
9. North by Northwest- I love Hitchcock and this is probably my favorite. I sat on the edge of my seat the whole movie.
10. Rebecca- Do you know, I have never seen the iconic Hitchcock version of Rebecca? I've only seen an obscure Masterpiece Theater version that was made some time in the 2000s. It was fantastic and I can wholeheartedly recommend it.
Monday, July 14, 2014
Saving the Season
It's canning season and I'm having fun looking through canning cookbooks for ideas and inspiration. There's something so exciting and anticipatory about looking through a really beautiful canning cookbook. One of my favorites this season is Saving the Season by Kevin West. It's a big, fat canning cookbook, full of recipes for canned everything, from marmalades to pickles to syrups. It also has the added advantage of being full of all kinds of eccentric fruits and vegetables, not just your basic strawberry freezer jam.
I love this cookbook for a number of reasons. The pictures are all gorgeous and perfectly portray the tone of the book. The recipes are written with enough instructions to be clear, but not so much that the reader becomes bogged down by unnecessary details-a fine line to balance for cookbook writers. The book has that lovely, crisp, new-book smell that I so adore. And finally, the food all looks delicious.
As a little picture of the recipes that this cookbook holds, let me tell you what from this book is on my to-can list this summer:
-Watermelon Rind Pickles
-Elderberry Syrup
-Yellow Peach Slices in Tea Syrup
-Spicy Sweet Squash Pickle
-Apple Jelly with Mint
-Pine Cone Syrup
Actually, I would happily make anything from this cookbook, if given the time and ingredients, but these are the main things that I am itching to try. I don't think I would regret trying any of these delicious recipes. So for those of you who can, what is your favorite canning cookbook? Do you have one, or do you stick to the basics?
I love this cookbook for a number of reasons. The pictures are all gorgeous and perfectly portray the tone of the book. The recipes are written with enough instructions to be clear, but not so much that the reader becomes bogged down by unnecessary details-a fine line to balance for cookbook writers. The book has that lovely, crisp, new-book smell that I so adore. And finally, the food all looks delicious.
As a little picture of the recipes that this cookbook holds, let me tell you what from this book is on my to-can list this summer:
-Watermelon Rind Pickles
-Elderberry Syrup
-Yellow Peach Slices in Tea Syrup
-Spicy Sweet Squash Pickle
-Apple Jelly with Mint
-Pine Cone Syrup
Actually, I would happily make anything from this cookbook, if given the time and ingredients, but these are the main things that I am itching to try. I don't think I would regret trying any of these delicious recipes. So for those of you who can, what is your favorite canning cookbook? Do you have one, or do you stick to the basics?
Sunday, July 13, 2014
The Baker Street Letters
I barely read at all on vacation (I know, go ahead and be shocked), but I did finish one book on the trip down there. I read The Baker Street Letters, a book I'd been looking forward to for quite a while. I am a big fan of the Sherlock Holmes books and so I thought that this story of two brothers who own offices where Sherlock Holmes "lived" would be right up my alley.
Here's the basic plot: Reggie and Nigel Heath are two brothers who are radically different. Nigel, the younger brother, is a lawyer who is slightly mentally unstable. After a month in a mental hospital, Nigel is back, working in an underling position for his big brother, Reggie, a very successful lawyer. Nigel discovers letters from an 8 year old girl in Los Angeles, written to Sherlock Holmes, asking for help finding her missing father. Nigel sets off on a wild goose chase, with Reggie close behind.
Doesn't that sound good? Well, it was kind of a flop. Michael Robertson, the author, is one of those people who don't sound entirely comfortable with writing. The sentences were often a bit cumbersome and the experiences of the main characters felt rather contrived at times. He also took far too long getting to the actual mystery, with lengthy chapters that delved into Reggie's supposedly complex emotional life. I found myself alternating between yawning and the occasional eye roll. In short, the book wasn't very well written.
It also had the fault of being not very Sherlockian. There were no references to past stories, no links to things about Sherlock, except for the obvious connection of having the same address. That's not enough, in my opinion, to warrant calling this a Sherlock spinoff or even a book inspired by Sherlock Holmes. That clever way of solving mysteries through observation that Sherlock had was completely lost in this book.
But it isn't like this book doesn't have redeeming qualities. Robertson does have the ability to write wryly and with a sly humor that could be very enjoyable. I liked that Reggie and Nigel were both fully human people with understandable faults. But that's about all the good I can find to say about this book.
So maybe I wasn't in the right mood for this book, but it's definitely not the kind of book where I want to immediately find the other books and read the rest of the series. I'm wondering if this book will settle in my mind so that I remember it with fonder thoughts. If so, I'll let you all know.
Here's the basic plot: Reggie and Nigel Heath are two brothers who are radically different. Nigel, the younger brother, is a lawyer who is slightly mentally unstable. After a month in a mental hospital, Nigel is back, working in an underling position for his big brother, Reggie, a very successful lawyer. Nigel discovers letters from an 8 year old girl in Los Angeles, written to Sherlock Holmes, asking for help finding her missing father. Nigel sets off on a wild goose chase, with Reggie close behind.
Doesn't that sound good? Well, it was kind of a flop. Michael Robertson, the author, is one of those people who don't sound entirely comfortable with writing. The sentences were often a bit cumbersome and the experiences of the main characters felt rather contrived at times. He also took far too long getting to the actual mystery, with lengthy chapters that delved into Reggie's supposedly complex emotional life. I found myself alternating between yawning and the occasional eye roll. In short, the book wasn't very well written.
It also had the fault of being not very Sherlockian. There were no references to past stories, no links to things about Sherlock, except for the obvious connection of having the same address. That's not enough, in my opinion, to warrant calling this a Sherlock spinoff or even a book inspired by Sherlock Holmes. That clever way of solving mysteries through observation that Sherlock had was completely lost in this book.
But it isn't like this book doesn't have redeeming qualities. Robertson does have the ability to write wryly and with a sly humor that could be very enjoyable. I liked that Reggie and Nigel were both fully human people with understandable faults. But that's about all the good I can find to say about this book.
So maybe I wasn't in the right mood for this book, but it's definitely not the kind of book where I want to immediately find the other books and read the rest of the series. I'm wondering if this book will settle in my mind so that I remember it with fonder thoughts. If so, I'll let you all know.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
Fahrenheit 451
Whew! This book was good, but kind of overwhelming. Well, that's very strong, but it was definitely a grim read for the first part of the book. So here are my thoughts about it.
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is one of those books that, apparently, everybody except me read in late middle school/early high school. I managed to never pick up that book, but now I finally just did. It's a dystopian novel written in the 1950s before dystopian novels were written en masse. It is about a world where a select few live with all of the privileges that include walls of their houses completely converted to screens so that the people can "live" with their movie characters. Books are burned by firemen because they encourage critical thought and keep the people from being perfectly placid. The story is told by Guy Montag, a firefighter who suddenly starts to feel bad about burning all these books. He meets a teenaged girl, Clarisse, who is like no other person he has ever met. She spends time outside and thinks and mentions talking to her family instead of watching the walls, like most people.
Later, Montag is stunned when Clarisse is killed and he becomes disillusioned with his work of burning books. Along with a team of old English professors, writers, and avid readers, he sets to work, smuggling books and saving them from the burning piles.
So first of all for the part I didn't like-The conversations between Clarisse and Montag were weirdly stilted. Ray Bradbury's writing gift is obviously not conversations. In fact, most of this short novella is descriptions and passive rather than active voice. Every writer has it beat into his or her head at some point that passive voice must be actively avoided (haha). Yet Bradbury skillfully uses passive voice without it becoming dry or poorly written. I was impressed.
I was amazed by how much I loved this book. It's a very dark book, but the end message (I'm not going to give away the ending to you) is one of hope and reconciliation. Sure, great damage had been wreaked, but there was ultimate hope. The other thing I found enjoyable about the story was how pro-books it was. Of course, most books are "pro book", but this was was quite explicit about the need for reading in society. As you can probably imagine, I very much appreciated this.
...And now I will stop procrastinating and work on bag packing. I'm off for a trip that will take me away from this blog until next Sunday. Until then, I hope you all have a lovely week. The side bar with archives is there, as always.
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is one of those books that, apparently, everybody except me read in late middle school/early high school. I managed to never pick up that book, but now I finally just did. It's a dystopian novel written in the 1950s before dystopian novels were written en masse. It is about a world where a select few live with all of the privileges that include walls of their houses completely converted to screens so that the people can "live" with their movie characters. Books are burned by firemen because they encourage critical thought and keep the people from being perfectly placid. The story is told by Guy Montag, a firefighter who suddenly starts to feel bad about burning all these books. He meets a teenaged girl, Clarisse, who is like no other person he has ever met. She spends time outside and thinks and mentions talking to her family instead of watching the walls, like most people.
Later, Montag is stunned when Clarisse is killed and he becomes disillusioned with his work of burning books. Along with a team of old English professors, writers, and avid readers, he sets to work, smuggling books and saving them from the burning piles.
So first of all for the part I didn't like-The conversations between Clarisse and Montag were weirdly stilted. Ray Bradbury's writing gift is obviously not conversations. In fact, most of this short novella is descriptions and passive rather than active voice. Every writer has it beat into his or her head at some point that passive voice must be actively avoided (haha). Yet Bradbury skillfully uses passive voice without it becoming dry or poorly written. I was impressed.
I was amazed by how much I loved this book. It's a very dark book, but the end message (I'm not going to give away the ending to you) is one of hope and reconciliation. Sure, great damage had been wreaked, but there was ultimate hope. The other thing I found enjoyable about the story was how pro-books it was. Of course, most books are "pro book", but this was was quite explicit about the need for reading in society. As you can probably imagine, I very much appreciated this.
...And now I will stop procrastinating and work on bag packing. I'm off for a trip that will take me away from this blog until next Sunday. Until then, I hope you all have a lovely week. The side bar with archives is there, as always.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)