I'll be back tomorrow with a review of Unpunished. Yes! I finally got around to reading the dang thing and it was a wonderful read.
Thursday, May 29, 2014
A Toast Rack
I'll be back tomorrow with a review of Unpunished. Yes! I finally got around to reading the dang thing and it was a wonderful read.
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Henry Reed
I'm back again today with yet another wonderful children's book, this time for slightly older readers. This book is in my personal library and the other day I just randomly picked it up and started reading it. The book is called Henry Reed's Babysitting Service. Henry Reed is the son of an ambassador who travels all over the world. Every summer, he comes to his aunt and uncle's cozy little 1950s New Jersey neighborhood. There are several books, but my favorite is definitely Henry Reed's Babysitting. After the previous summer which is covered in the first book, Henry returns to Grover's Corner and proceeds to plan another moneymaking scheme with his friend Midge.
After conducting lengthy surveys of all the neighbors, they see that there is a real need for babysitting. And there starts the fun. There is the busy housewife for whom they cook hamburgers, little knowing that the "hamburger meat" is really ground horse meat for the poodle; and there's the extremely naughty little girl who is surprisingly good at hiding from her caretakers. But no matter what Henry and Midge do, they always have surprising adventures. And of course, as in all good 50s children's books, adults are blissfully absent, meaning that the children can have uproarious times without any supervision whatsoever.
The book is written in a diary form (something I don't normally enjoy reading), but the stories are so funny and interesting that it works quite well. I think that the diary form actually works very well for the reader because Henry's voice comes through so clearly without interruptions from the author.
I first heard of these books in middle school, when my dad read one of them aloud. I remember loving them at once, so it was fun to read through this book again. This story is really great for any age. Along with Henry's very funny voice are the great illustrations. All 5 of the Henry Reed books were illustrated by the famous Robert McCloskey (who illustrated and wrote Blueberries for Sal). Anybody as young as 6 would get the humor and the adventures and there is something timeless about the stories, even with the 50s American references.
After conducting lengthy surveys of all the neighbors, they see that there is a real need for babysitting. And there starts the fun. There is the busy housewife for whom they cook hamburgers, little knowing that the "hamburger meat" is really ground horse meat for the poodle; and there's the extremely naughty little girl who is surprisingly good at hiding from her caretakers. But no matter what Henry and Midge do, they always have surprising adventures. And of course, as in all good 50s children's books, adults are blissfully absent, meaning that the children can have uproarious times without any supervision whatsoever.
Henry and Midge |
The book is written in a diary form (something I don't normally enjoy reading), but the stories are so funny and interesting that it works quite well. I think that the diary form actually works very well for the reader because Henry's voice comes through so clearly without interruptions from the author.
I first heard of these books in middle school, when my dad read one of them aloud. I remember loving them at once, so it was fun to read through this book again. This story is really great for any age. Along with Henry's very funny voice are the great illustrations. All 5 of the Henry Reed books were illustrated by the famous Robert McCloskey (who illustrated and wrote Blueberries for Sal). Anybody as young as 6 would get the humor and the adventures and there is something timeless about the stories, even with the 50s American references.
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Alfie and Annie Rose
This darling little book is in a genre that I don't normally read, but it's such a sweet book that it really deserves it's own review. The Alfie and Annie Rose books are stories about two little 80s/90s British children and their happy lives. The stories are told mainly from Alfie's perspective, but Annie Rose definitely plays a big role in the stories. Alfie is a 4 or 5 year old and Annie Rose is a toddler, so she's probably anywhere from 1-3. I just read recently that Alfie would be 30 now if he were a real person. That surprised me so much because Alfie lives in my mind as a 5 year old. He has all kinds of adventures from going to a birthday party where his friend gets very wild and naughty to befriending the "big boy" (a first grader) at school. Alfie and Annie Rose live charming, normal lives and I remember how much I identified with them.
Just recently, my mom got one of the Alfie and Annie Rose books just for fun. It was fun to flip through those pages again and remember so many of those stories. I grew up reading these stories and I was amazed how much I remembered about the books. I think that these books are so enjoyable in large part because Shirley Hughes (the author) clearly knows children so well. She understands just how excited and out of control children get at a 5 year old birthday party and she knows about naming inanimate objects funny names (I had a pumpkin named Perenkin when I was about Alfie's age). In addition to all these wonderful qualities, the illustrations are gorgeous. The family's cluttery, cozy little London flat is so much fun to see.
I really do recommend these books for anybody. If you have some contact with any children (or if you don't), I think these books are a must-read. When there are so many unlikeable characters in children's books and sub-par stories, these books are very refreshing.
Just recently, my mom got one of the Alfie and Annie Rose books just for fun. It was fun to flip through those pages again and remember so many of those stories. I grew up reading these stories and I was amazed how much I remembered about the books. I think that these books are so enjoyable in large part because Shirley Hughes (the author) clearly knows children so well. She understands just how excited and out of control children get at a 5 year old birthday party and she knows about naming inanimate objects funny names (I had a pumpkin named Perenkin when I was about Alfie's age). In addition to all these wonderful qualities, the illustrations are gorgeous. The family's cluttery, cozy little London flat is so much fun to see.
An illustration from one of the books. |
I really do recommend these books for anybody. If you have some contact with any children (or if you don't), I think these books are a must-read. When there are so many unlikeable characters in children's books and sub-par stories, these books are very refreshing.
Monday, May 26, 2014
Library Loot 5/26
Whew! Well, I've finally got my Library Loot post together for the week. I've got a good selection of books this week, mostly from the library. The other new thing that I've got this week is several nonfiction things! I just happened to find a bunch of great nonfiction books in the archives of this blog that I thought I must read. So here goes:
1. What the World Eats by Faith D'Aluisio and Peter Menzel- This book came out quite awhile ago and I heard fantastic things about it, then promptly forgot it. So now, I'm going to finally get around to reading this.
2. Unpunished- This dagblamed book is getting on my nerves. It's been in my library loot pile for three weeks and I still can't get around to reading it. This will be the week that I finally read it!
3. The Elements: A Visual Exploration of Every Known Atom in the Universe by Theodore Gray- Recommended by the blog mentioned above. I just thought this looked mildly interesting. We'll see how it is.
4. Evelina by Fanny Burney- An interesting-looking book that I look forward to reading. It's a funny 18th century novel.
5. Dear Enemy by Jean Webster- By the author who wrote the slightly more famous Daddy Long-Legs (which I need to read), this is the story of a woman who takes the role of superintendent of an orphanage.
6. The Baker Street Letters by Michael Robertson- I just recently finished the Sherlock TV show and loved it and then read the original Sherlock Holmes books. I'm excited to see how this book turns out.
I feel like I got a good haul this week. I'm excited to see how the books are! And yet again, my interlibrary loan limit was exceeded. Sigh.
1. What the World Eats by Faith D'Aluisio and Peter Menzel- This book came out quite awhile ago and I heard fantastic things about it, then promptly forgot it. So now, I'm going to finally get around to reading this.
2. Unpunished- This dagblamed book is getting on my nerves. It's been in my library loot pile for three weeks and I still can't get around to reading it. This will be the week that I finally read it!
3. The Elements: A Visual Exploration of Every Known Atom in the Universe by Theodore Gray- Recommended by the blog mentioned above. I just thought this looked mildly interesting. We'll see how it is.
4. Evelina by Fanny Burney- An interesting-looking book that I look forward to reading. It's a funny 18th century novel.
5. Dear Enemy by Jean Webster- By the author who wrote the slightly more famous Daddy Long-Legs (which I need to read), this is the story of a woman who takes the role of superintendent of an orphanage.
6. The Baker Street Letters by Michael Robertson- I just recently finished the Sherlock TV show and loved it and then read the original Sherlock Holmes books. I'm excited to see how this book turns out.
I feel like I got a good haul this week. I'm excited to see how the books are! And yet again, my interlibrary loan limit was exceeded. Sigh.
Sunday, May 25, 2014
Sunday Afternoon Thoughts and a Question
I'm sitting here planning my posts for the week. I just wanted to drop in to let you all know that I'll be back tomorrow with my (more or less) weekly Library Loot post and then I've got a whole list of great books to review for you. I've been enjoying spending a little of my Sunday afternoon lounging time planning for my weekly blogging. I love blogging and for me, it is purely fun and relaxing. However, it can get exhausting to have to think up what to write about, write it, then edit it, then add pictures/links/etc. I've found that doing the rough draft on Sunday afternoon (including planning for pictures/links/etc.) makes my blogging during the week a lot less time consuming. Then, I just have to edit and read through the post and add the pictures and I'm done. However, if I change my mind about what I want to write about, then I've got this extra post that I've got to fit in somewhere. But other than that small drawback, I really enjoy this writing method.
So, for those of you who blog, how do you organize and make time for your writing? Do you start each time you post with a fresh idea and do all your writing at once, or do you do something a little like I do? And here's the other question: Do you ever have the problem of forgetting about posts in drafts and then finding them weeks later?
For those of you who don't blog, how do you write other things? Do you start something, then think about it for a while and finish it, or do you just write the whole thing start to finish in one blow?
I look forward to hearing from all of you!
A kitty picture. Just because. |
So, for those of you who blog, how do you organize and make time for your writing? Do you start each time you post with a fresh idea and do all your writing at once, or do you do something a little like I do? And here's the other question: Do you ever have the problem of forgetting about posts in drafts and then finding them weeks later?
For those of you who don't blog, how do you write other things? Do you start something, then think about it for a while and finish it, or do you just write the whole thing start to finish in one blow?
I look forward to hearing from all of you!
Saturday, May 24, 2014
Sewing and a Book Review
Today, I have been busy with projects and flaxing around (apparently flaxing isn't a word...autocorrect suggests "flapping" or "flexing", neither of which I was doing...in my book, it means "flying around, getting lots of things done"). One of the things I did was start work on a fabulous late 40s/early 50s wrap dress. I seem to have a bit of a thing with wrap dresses this summer. I made a flowery short 60s dress that is for fairly nice occasions and this dress is completely different. It's long and swishy and will be for really hot August days at home. I actually took the time to stop and take pictures, so I've included a few.
That blue thing is the bias tape that I'm using as facing in the place of a regular facing. The pattern I'm using was missing any facing pieces. |
This actually has a little bit to do with a book I just read. Well, "read" is a little too serious. It was more like, "skimmed some parts and read some parts admired the pretty pictures". The book, written in the 90s, is called Life, Loss, and What I Wore. I picked it up simply because I had a few minutes and I didn't want to be engrossed in something really good and burn the rhubarb sauce all over the stove (I did that anyway). This book is a very small memoir of a woman's life, as lived through her clothes. So, the story starts out with a dress that her mother made and wore in the 30s and moves through her life. Each page is a small anecdote and its facing page is an illustration of the dress. Each chapter is a decade and ends in the 90s, with the author's granddaughter playing dress-up in one of her old dresses. And there were some gorgeous vintage dresses mentioned. I especially loved the description and picture of the author's elegant 50s ball dress. Reading this description, this sounds like a charming and interesting read. And it was, to some extent. However, I didn't love it. The writing style sounded extremely dated (in a bad way), but it wasn't just that. It was extremely self-involved and navel-gazey. I found myself saying, "Oh please," more than once. So, I don't recommend this unless you just happen to own the book and haven't read it or you really want to know about it and get it from the library. It's not worth purchasing, in my humble opinion.
The book |
But back to my dress. I can't wait to see how it turns out. I love this era of pattern and I think it's going to be a very nice, practical dress. Here's the pattern, so you can see what the end product will look like. I'm doing the shorter version because, honestly, can't you just imagine tripping over that long skirt every time you walked?
Friday, May 23, 2014
A Wilder Rose
Last week, I was talking to my grandmother and she was enthusiastically telling me about this wonderful book about Rose Wilder Lane, the daughter of Laura Ingalls Wilder. I listened, exclaimed that it sounded wonderful, then promptly forgot about it. However, she was persistent, and so now I've read the book, too. And what a wonderful read it was!
A Wilder Rose is the fictionalized account of Rose Wilder's often-fraught relationship with her mother, particularly when helping her mother write the Little House books. From unpublished diaries and letters, historians and writers are beginning to see that Rose Wilder pretty much wrote the Little House books herself. Rose was a very skilled editor, journalist, and writer and had a lot of experience in the publishing world. Laura, on the other hand, and pretty much no skill, but she had a lot of good stories. Laura and Rose's relationship when writing the Little House books is the basis of this book. According to this book (and who knows how much of this is fictionalized and how much is really based on fact), Rose spent her whole life feeling like Laura didn't quite approve of her. This feeling only intensified when, at the age of 3, Rose was left alone while Laura was sick. Wanting desperately to help, Rose put too much wood on the fire and burned the Wilder's little house down. Rose writes of still remembering that sickening realization of what she had done. This was just the start of many years of severe poverty and hard living. Rose agreed to basically write these books for her mother with no credit because she always felt indebted to her parents because of all the loss they had suffered.
Once Rose grew up, she was determined to make something of herself and so attended high school in Louisiana with one of Almanzo's (her father) sisters. After that, she attended college and began a high-powered writing career. She had a brief marriage which collapsed shortly after the death of her only son. When the Depression came, Rose returned to the Ozarks to live with her parents. That was when she had her mother began working on the Little House books. The journey from a very unpolished memoir that Laura wrote to the polished stories that we know of today is a fascinating one.
The book is told by Rose to a young aspiring journalist who is living with her. This made for some kind of confusing foreshadowing that I think the author could have worked a little harder to make clear. However, that is my only complaint. I was surprised at how different these well-known characters appeared to be. Laura became a very different, but 3-dimensional, character. This book portrays her as a very domineering, grasping, not-very-nice person. But in spite of these less-than-perfect character traits, we come to identify with and pity both Laura and Rose through this story.
I recommend this book to anybody who has read the Little House books, which is a pretty large percentage of the population! The story is well-told and gives the reader another perspective into these well-known stories. I think that I am going to read a non-fiction book that has just come out about Laura and Rose's relationship. I'll let you know what I think of it and how it compares to this book.
As usual, I have the amazon links for this book and the A Ghost in the Little House, the non-fiction book I'm going to read.
A Wilder Rose is the fictionalized account of Rose Wilder's often-fraught relationship with her mother, particularly when helping her mother write the Little House books. From unpublished diaries and letters, historians and writers are beginning to see that Rose Wilder pretty much wrote the Little House books herself. Rose was a very skilled editor, journalist, and writer and had a lot of experience in the publishing world. Laura, on the other hand, and pretty much no skill, but she had a lot of good stories. Laura and Rose's relationship when writing the Little House books is the basis of this book. According to this book (and who knows how much of this is fictionalized and how much is really based on fact), Rose spent her whole life feeling like Laura didn't quite approve of her. This feeling only intensified when, at the age of 3, Rose was left alone while Laura was sick. Wanting desperately to help, Rose put too much wood on the fire and burned the Wilder's little house down. Rose writes of still remembering that sickening realization of what she had done. This was just the start of many years of severe poverty and hard living. Rose agreed to basically write these books for her mother with no credit because she always felt indebted to her parents because of all the loss they had suffered.
Rose Wilder Lane |
Once Rose grew up, she was determined to make something of herself and so attended high school in Louisiana with one of Almanzo's (her father) sisters. After that, she attended college and began a high-powered writing career. She had a brief marriage which collapsed shortly after the death of her only son. When the Depression came, Rose returned to the Ozarks to live with her parents. That was when she had her mother began working on the Little House books. The journey from a very unpolished memoir that Laura wrote to the polished stories that we know of today is a fascinating one.
The book is told by Rose to a young aspiring journalist who is living with her. This made for some kind of confusing foreshadowing that I think the author could have worked a little harder to make clear. However, that is my only complaint. I was surprised at how different these well-known characters appeared to be. Laura became a very different, but 3-dimensional, character. This book portrays her as a very domineering, grasping, not-very-nice person. But in spite of these less-than-perfect character traits, we come to identify with and pity both Laura and Rose through this story.
I recommend this book to anybody who has read the Little House books, which is a pretty large percentage of the population! The story is well-told and gives the reader another perspective into these well-known stories. I think that I am going to read a non-fiction book that has just come out about Laura and Rose's relationship. I'll let you know what I think of it and how it compares to this book.
As usual, I have the amazon links for this book and the A Ghost in the Little House, the non-fiction book I'm going to read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)