I read a really interesting nonfiction book recently. I'm discovering something interesting about myself. My whole life, I've never really felt the need to read nonfiction. Nonfiction just never spoke to my reading self. However, recently, my reading tastes have broadened. I am enjoying pretty much any nonfiction book. In fact, my nonfiction reading tastes are much broader than my fiction reading tastes. I credit my inner sociologist. I have always been fascinated by people and why people do what they do and what they think and how they behave. Nonfiction accounts of people's thoughts and inner workings perfectly feed that inner sociologist.
So anyway, my latest nonfiction book was The Language of God by Francis S. Collins. It was recommended to me some time ago and I picked it up at the library the other week. This book is written by the head of the Human Genome Project. He also happens to be a devout Christian who was deeply inspired by C.S. Lewis's writings. In fact, Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis was what brought him to Christianity.
In this book, Collins argues that Christianity and science are actually compatible, that the two do not need to have the discordant relationship that they have historically had, particularly in regards to evolution. He starts the book by giving his personal journey of faith. He grew up with two hippie, back-to-the-land, adamantly atheist parents who homeschooled him and his brothers. He went to college and studied physics, before eventually meandering over to the field of medicine. After talking to a dying patient who asked him about what he believed, he began to rethink everything he'd ever been taught, culminating in his reading of Mere Christianity.
Collins goes on to talk about the arguments that scientists/atheists pose against Christianity, from the argument that so much wrong has been done in the name of Christianity, to the argument that Christianity is not "smart" or "logical". All of the common arguments were addressed very well.
Next, he talks about the warring viewpoints- creationism, atheism/agnosticism, intelligent design, and his own viewpoint, which he calls biologos, or theistic evolution. I think that this was probably my favorite section.
I'll leave the rest of the book for you to explore, though. You really must read it for yourself to get a true idea of what this book is about.
I think that Collins's most powerful argument is that we weaken God when we argue that God would not be real to us if the earth was not created in a literal 7 days, etc. He talks about how we place this ridiculously human limitations on God. Collins makes the point that God can, indeed be the master over all areas of science, that science is yet another language of God. I found this to be a beautiful and poignant message.
This is probably the most controversial book that I've ever reviewed and it feels a little funny writing about something that is a rather tense issue right now. But, I enjoyed this book and found it to be a thought provoking piece of writing. If you're interested in this, Collins has also headed up a whole organization/website called BioLogos, or faith and science in harmony. Here's the link:
http://biologos.org.
This book is for anybody who has ever thought about the rather fraught with tension issue of science and faith. I think that this book perfectly addressed this issue, if only as a presentation of another position. I highly recommend it.
This sounds definitely worth a look. I remember that what I loved about Madeleine L'Engle's books was that she didn't find science and religion to be incompatible either; they were both beautiful and true. It would be fascinating to read this from a scientist's point of view.
ReplyDeleteOh yes, dear Madeline L'Engle. I remember being so impressed by her worldview when I read something nonfiction by her (can't remember what).
Delete